• VB search
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#11 Old 08-06-2014, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
 
MicOnTheNorthShore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katherine View Post
Truthfully that remains to be seen. I mean, Mic can recite factoids that he's found through google until the cows come home, but the truth is that nobody but the new owners know where we are headed until we get there.

For myself, I am a bit concerned about the site being owned by a Canadian owned since Canada's libel and slander laws are less forgiving than those of the US.
Katherine's speculation is again off the mark. Anything I wrote here did not come from researching anything, nor did I make mention of the owner's direction.

Applicable libel law is determined by the location of an author when they pen a statement, not that of a server. Accordingly, the operator of this site is located in the US, not Toronto.
MicOnTheNorthShore is offline  
#12 Old 08-07-2014, 07:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Katherine's speculation is again off the mark. Anything I wrote here did not come from researching anything, nor did I make mention of the owner's direction.
I think it should of been obvious that I was referring to your remarks about Vertical Scope.

Quote:
Applicable libel law is determined by the location of an author when they pen a statement, not that of a server. Accordingly, the operator of this site is located in the US, not Toronto.
Ummm, that doesn't even make sense. Sites are subject to the laws of the country that they are based in. RateMDs is now owned by a Canadian company. Which may mean that it is subject to Canadian law. OTOH, maybe it is still legally based in the US. IDK. Perhaps the Admin could fill us in.
Katherine is offline  
#13 Old 08-08-2014, 10:06 AM
Senior Member
 
MicOnTheNorthShore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katherine View Post
I think it should of been obvious that I was referring to your remarks about Vertical Scope.

Ummm, that doesn't even make sense. Sites are subject to the laws of the country that they are based in. RateMDs is now owned by a Canadian company. Which may mean that it is subject to Canadian law. OTOH, maybe it is still legally based in the US. IDK. Perhaps the Admin could fill us in.
It makes perfect sense, and you already partially answered your own question. I took your foray into the subject of libel to be pertaining to users, not the site operator, qualifying my comments by referring to authors. I'm perplexed as to why you would be concerned about the site operator.

I wrote, "Applicable libel law is determined by the location of an author when they pen a statement, not that of a server. Accordingly, the operator of this site is located in the US, not Toronto.", based on your comment, "For myself, I am a bit concerned about the site being owned by a Canadian owned since Canada's libel and slander laws are less forgiving than those of the US."

If I post a libelous statement from my home in Canada, I will be subject to BC libel law. To the extent that Vertical Scope, USA (the actual site owner, a subsidiary of Vertical Scope in Toronto) would be named as a third party and subject to the libel law in the US state where they were incorporated.

If you posted a libelous statement, you would be subject to the laws of the state in which you were situated when you wrote it. You would have protection in limited situations under the Communications Decency Act, Section 230(c) as set by precedent in Barrett vs. Rothenthal. That case states that a user has Sec. 230(c) where they are merely quoting an otherwise libelous message or email from another author.

In some cases in civil law, a suit may be initiated not in the defendent's jurisdiction, but where the "transaction" occurred. This is sometimes the case where two parties interact via the mail, Internet, etc., and not together in one jurisdiction, and the reason why some agreements state that the laws of a certain jurisdiction will govern the interaction.

It is virtually standard operating procedure for non-US companies to set up subsidiary corporations in the US to own and operate websites, particularly those carrying user content, such as forums and messaging or email. That gains the "operator" of the site protection under the CDA Sec 230(c).
MicOnTheNorthShore is offline  
#14 Old 08-08-2014, 11:12 AM
Administrator
 
Administrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katherine View Post
I think it should of been obvious that I was referring to your remarks about Vertical Scope.



Ummm, that doesn't even make sense. Sites are subject to the laws of the country that they are based in. RateMDs is now owned by a Canadian company. Which may mean that it is subject to Canadian law. OTOH, maybe it is still legally based in the US. IDK. Perhaps the Admin could fill us in.
RateMDs is a US company.
Administrator is offline  
#15 Old 08-10-2014, 07:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9,942
Gagal and Puzzle have been banned. I wonder who else has been banned.
Wiser is offline  
#16 Old 08-11-2014, 04:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,367
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiser View Post
Gagal and Puzzle have been banned. I wonder who else has been banned.
What???????? When????? Why?????
rockygirl is offline  
#17 Old 08-11-2014, 05:34 AM
Senior Member
 
MicOnTheNorthShore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiser View Post
Gagal and Puzzle have been banned. I wonder who else has been banned.
Perhaps they're just having difficulty logging in or are encountering a block on the old site, misinterpreting that as a ban.

Last edited by MicOnTheNorthShore; 08-11-2014 at 05:38 AM.
MicOnTheNorthShore is offline  
#18 Old 08-13-2014, 08:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicOnTheNorthShore View Post
Perhaps they're just having difficulty logging in or are encountering a block on the old site, misinterpreting that as a ban.
This seems far more likely than them being banned.
Katherine is offline  
#19 Old 08-15-2014, 11:31 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katherine View Post
This seems far more likely than them being banned.
When I tried to log in with my old account I got a message that I had been permanently banned. It has taken me several days to finally get signed up again.
aaries is offline  
#20 Old 10-28-2014, 09:50 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Wilmington Delaware
Posts: 97
My name is Richard Kim - doctor in Wilmington Delaware. Nice to meet you.
aacdel.com is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome